Your Socially-Engineered Future

Pray for peace, but prepare for war.

What would you get with a Demorat-controlled White House, Senate and House of Representatives?

Complete and total "Social Engineering."

You would get this and more:

Christian Photographer Hauled before Commission for
Refusing Same-Sex Job
By John Jalsevac
New Mexico, January 30, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The case of a Christian photographer who refused to photograph a same-sex "commitment ceremony", was heard before the New Mexico Human Rights Division on Monday.

A same-sex couple asked Elaine Huguenin, co-owner with her husband of Elane Photography, to photograph a "commitment ceremony" that the two women wanted to hold. Huguenin declined because her Christian beliefs are in conflict with the message communicated by the ceremony.

The same-sex couple filed a complaint with the New Mexico Human Rights Division, which is now trying Elane Photography under state antidiscrimination laws for sexual orientation discrimination.

Do you understand the components of this issue?

• This is a private business.
• Not a government-run entity.
• Not a government-funded or supported entity.
• This is a state-run commission making the decision, not the federal government.

Does the 10th Amendment hold here?

More:

On Monday we defended Elane Photography in court, saying basically that no person should be required to help others advance a message that they disagree with," ADF Senior Counsel and Senior Vice-President of the Office of Strategic Initiatives, Jordan Lorence, told LifeSiteNews in an interview today. "That's a basic First Amendment principle. The government is punishing Elaine photography for refusing to take photos which obviously advance the messages sent by the same-sex ceremony - that marriage can be defined as two women or two men."

In their complaint the homosexual couple has sought for an injunction against Elane Photography that will forbid them from ever again refusing to photograph a same-sex ceremony. They have also requested attorney's fees.

"Depending on how far up the ladder this goes of appeal that could be a lot of money," said Lorence. "Hundreds of thousands of dollars."

Could this also not be a Fifth Amendment issue as well? Why should it potentially cost a small business "hundreds of thousands of dollars" to hold to their religious beliefs?

Heard of this case? I'd wager not.

Do the Logical Extension: Clear and obvious social engineering. Coming soon more directly, more openly, more arrogantly, to a court and political system near you.

BZ